this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
2446 points (97.0% liked)

Linus Tech Tips

3799 readers
1 users here now

~~⚠️ De-clickbait-ify the youtube titles or your post will be removed!~~

~~Floatplane titles are perfectly fine.~~

~~LTT/LMG community. Brought to you by ******... Actually, no, not this time. This time it's brought to you by Lemmy, the open communities and free and open source software!~~

~~If you post videos from Youtube/LTT, please please un-clickbait the titles. (You can use the title from https://nitter.net/LTTtranslator/ but it doesn't seem to have been updated in quite some while...)~~

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 


Some updates I got from threadreaderapp:

Link to the thread provided by @[email protected].

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which is a totally acceptable point of view. He's even said he won't make any moves to stop them from unionizing.

Now, whether you believe him or not is up to you, but I don't think anything he's said on the topic is ethically wrong.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a union organizer in an adjacent industry (video games). This is a very common anti-union talking point amongst bosses and managers that want to look progressive. The underlying message is "I'm ok with unions, but not here".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

NIMBY doesnt ever end.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With respect, I would disagree. Taking it personally is a problem. Expecting everyone else to 'just trust me bro' is a problem. Look at it another way- 'if my staff unionize and anything needs to change then I've already failed as a boss'

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

This seems like a weird interpretation, at least based on the paraphrasing above. There's no implicit anti union sentiment, it's just acknowledging he has an obligation to be a good steward for his employees?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

It's wrong in the sense that he apparently believes that he is able to provide everything that a union does, which is hilarious.

A union has hundreds or thousands of specialist employees working full time for the members, and this guy is like: "yeah I can do that while also managing my company".

At best he is saying "I'm willing to pay people to shut the fuck up."

In reality he probably doesn't even have a clue about what a union is about.