this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
32 points (88.1% liked)

Star Trek

1325 readers
1 users here now

This is the lemmy.ml Star Trek community.

There are many other Star Trek communities around the Lemmyverse, and there is a Lemmy instance entirely dedicated to the subject (startrek.website).

Here are links to some of those other communities:

/c/[email protected]: Serious, in-depth Star Trek discussion

/c/[email protected]: Star Trek memes and shitposts

/c/[email protected]: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name ("post all the nonsense you want")

/c/[email protected]: These are the voyages of the Starship Lenin.

/c/[email protected]: General Star Trek news and discussion

/c/[email protected]: Another general-purpose community

/c/[email protected]: Off-topic chat

/c/[email protected]: Star Trek Online discussion, tips, and tricks

/c/[email protected]: For fans of the Greatest Generation and Greatest Trek podcasts

/c/[email protected]: Meme-ory Alpha, another meme community

/c/[email protected]: Star Trek Memes & Shitposts

/c/[email protected]: A community for all things Star Trek.

/c/star_[email protected]: A Star Trek community where you’re free share your opinions about all things Trek.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Throwing in the word “younger” seems unnecessarily rude on Abram’s part. If he had constructive notes for Olyphant, that’s one thing, but Olyphant can’t do anything about his age. I can’t help but think that it would have been kinder to leave age out of it.

I guess that’s the reality of Hollywood, but damn.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think Abrahams was blaming Olyphant for his age, just that Kirk’s role needed to be cast with a young actor. Olyphant doesn’t meet that requirement. How should he have said that?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe by not saying it at all?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

wouldn’t that be dishonest?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A great deal of what we call “courtesy” involves not being completely honest at all times. Just because something is true doesn’t necessarily mean that it must be pointed out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

edit: what does this have to do with courtesy?

Olyphant would have been 40-41 when they were casting Star Trek (2009) and Chris Pine was 28-29. That’s a pretty meaningful age difference that comes off in both appearance and performance. It wasn’t just some minor detail— the actor who got cast had to play Kirk from the age of ~18-25, so it made a lot more sense to cast an actor much closer to that age. I don’t see the problem here or how explaining that is “mean”.

edit: in fact, Olyphant didn’t think it was mean at all:

FTA:

“Auditioning sucks,” Olyphant concluded, “and the fact that I remember the audition process fondly says a lot about J.J. Abrams and what a wonderful man that guy is.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hollywood actors are very aware of the requirements for the kinds of roles they take. I doubt he was offended.

They cast for roles that require people to be “the ugly friend” or whatever. Do you think those people get upset when they get the roles?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That’s why I ended my post with “I guess that’s the reality of Hollywood, but damn.”