this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)
Typography & fonts
385 readers
2 users here now
A community to discuss and share information about typography and fonts
Sibling community:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: detail from the title of Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style. Banner: details from pages 6 and 12, ibid.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Any ideas why sans serif seems to be taking over the world? I generally find serif fonts easier to read, at least when the medium has the necessary resolution to properly render them.
Anyway, I'll continue make sure that all my stylesheets are based on Garamond. :)
Sans serif and display fonts in general are designed with subpixel matrices in mind. How well they succeed is another thing entirely. You could easily design a serif font that's display friendly (see most monospace fonts) but they often invoke different feelings than a display font. That combined with the fact that Microsoft wants to push neumorphism, and font choice is part of that redesign, it makes sense to phase out calibri which was designed to fit with the flat look of metro design
Wait, is Microsoft's current "fluid" design language considered neo skeumorphism? (Also thanks for sharing the term neomorphism with me! I hadn't heard it shortened like that!) I haven't really followed Microsoft's ui design at all, I wasn't aware it fell into that category
Fluid is neumorphism and glassmorphism having a baby. Elements have depth and transparency but there's still some abstraction from skeumorphism because we've gotten used to computers a bit more but we want textures again.
Huh, I guess I'll have to go take a look at fluid again, I hadn't really followed it at all since it was first being talked about as their new design language. Thanks for filling me in!