Selfhosted

46677 readers

636 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

166

Do you actually audit open source projects you download? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The question is simple. I wanted to get a general consensus on if people actually audit the code that they use from FOSS or open source software or apps.

Do you blindly trust the FOSS community? I am trying to get a rough idea here. Sometimes audit the code? Only on mission critical apps? Not at all?

Let's hear it!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

For personal use? I never do anything that would qualify as "auditing" the code. I might glance at it, but mostly out of curiosity. If I'm contributing then I'll get to know the code as much as is needed for the thing I'm contributing, but still far from a proper audit. I think the idea that the open-source community is keeping a close eye on each other's code is a bit of a myth. No one has the time, unless someone has the money to pay for an audit.

I don't know whether corporations audit the open-source code they use, but in my experience it would be pretty hard to convince the typical executive that this is something worth investing in, like cybersecurity in general. They'd rather wait until disaster strikes then pay more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

My company only allows downloads from official sources, verified publishers, signed where we can. This is enforced by only allowing the repo server to download stuff and only from places we’ve configured. In general those go through a process to reduce the chances of problems and mitigate them quickly.

We also feed everything through a scanner to flag known vulnerabilities, unacceptable licenses

If it’s fully packaged installable software, we have security guys that take a look at I have no idea what they do and whether it’s an audit

I’m actually going round in circles with this one developer. He needs an open source package and we already cache it on the repo server in several form factors, from reputable sources ….. but he wants to run a random GitHub component which downloads an unsigned tar file from an untrusted source