this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
26 points (90.6% liked)
linux4noobs
2051 readers
30 users here now
linux4noobs
Noob Friendly, Expert Enabling
Whether you're a seasoned pro or the noobiest of noobs, you've found the right place for Linux support and information. With a dedication to supporting free and open source software, this community aims to ensure Linux fits your needs and works for you. From troubleshooting to tutorials, practical tips, news and more, all aspects of Linux are warmly welcomed. Join a community of like-minded enthusiasts and professionals driving Linux's ongoing evolution.
Seeking Support?
- Mention your Linux distro and relevant system details.
- Describe what you've tried so far.
- Share your solution even if you found it yourself.
- Do not delete your post. This allows other people to see possible solutions if they have a similar problem.
- Properly format any scripts, code, logs, or error messages.
- Be mindful to omit any sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, IP addresses, etc.
Community Rules
- Keep discussions respectful and amiable. This community is a space where individuals may freely inquire, exchange thoughts, express viewpoints, and extend help without encountering belittlement. We were all a noob at one point. Differing opinions and ideas is a normal part of discourse, but it must remain civil. Offenders will be warned and/or removed.
- Posts must be Linux oriented
- Spam or affiliate links will not be tolerated.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Tbf, idk how long those systems would take to boot with a systemd-less OS either, but I bet it's still longer than my systemd-having satellite or framework, because the problem here isn't systemd, it's the ancient hardware. It's like claiming iOS sucks because the OG iPhone can't run iOS 18 well. (It does suck of course due to the walled garden and many other things, but the point is trying to run newer stuff on older hardware is always going to be "slower" because "old hardware.")
I think somewhere deep down you probably know that. Sure, systemd is heavier than no systemd, but also hardware that isn't over 10yr+ old can run it fine and nitpicking about its boot time is ridiculous unless you have that specific need, in which case your need becomes pertinent information to your nitpick.
Btw, I'd be interested in knowing just how long "long time to boot" is, is it even longer than a minute or two, which would be serviceable on hardware that ancient imo?
Now I completely disagree with this. Slower is slower, no matter the hardware. On newest hardware faster stuff still will be faster and power consumption will be lower. Some slowdown can be justified (for example when it's related to critical security or the amount of installed apps) but saying that it's the hardware is completely ridiculous unless the hardware has to emulate unsupported calls or something like that.
Around 90 seconds on the 8 gb machine I'd say. Imo it's extremely long. I don't remember the boot time on the faster 4 gb machine but I remember that using an alternative init system increased the speed to one comparable with my gaming system with an NVMe SSD and Windows 11. And that is on an HDD-only machine. I think it's very impressive.
It obviously also depends on the amount of services activated but the difference was massive so I think installing way more stuff wouldn't slow it down to the systemd level.
Honestly 90sec isn't that bad for old hardware like that, and whether you agree with using the appropriate software for your old hardware or not, it's still a thing. This is a you problem for sure.