this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
589 points (96.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
9 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can see why you’d want separate “update” and “upgrade” options

i don't. anyone care to explain?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe for a server - regularly update the package list and compile a list of packages needed to be upgraded. Then send the list to an admin and let them do the update, so that it isn't unattended.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

makes sense, other package managers do the same. mixed it up with upgrade dist-upgrade which i still don't really get

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

upgrade upgrades only installed packages, and only when it can do so without adding/removing other packages. dist-upgrade will do the same, plus upgrade packages that have dependency changes. If package A v1 depends on package B, but package A v2 depends on package C instead, using upgrade will keep your package A at v1, while dist-upgrade will install the new dependency and upgrade package A to v2.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

great explanation, thank you :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you also please elaborate on what full-upgrade does?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

full-upgrade is dist-upgrade, it got renamed because of the possible ambiguity (one could think that it upgrade your distribution, like from debian 11 to 12)