this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)
Doctor Who Social Club
272 readers
35 users here now
A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.
Upcoming Episodes
| Date | Episode | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03 | 2x04 | "Lucky Day" |
| 05-10 | 2x05 | "The Story & the Engine" |
| 05-17 | 2x06 | "The Interstellar Song Contest" |
| 05-24 | 2x07 | "Wish World" |
| 05-31 | 2x08 | "The Reality War" |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Agreed. Chibnall's method of lore building seems to be like the guy at brainstorm meetings who just goes, "So here's an idea..." and then checks out for lunch.
The Gallifrey massacre especially needed a lot of workshopping before it reached the screen. First creative question, why did this need to happen? Surface reason, to traumatise the Doctor. Deeper reason, so there would be no Time Lords who the Doctor might ask questions that Chibnall couldn't answer?
I've always assumed (based on nothing, really) that Chibnall preferred the "Last of the Time Lords" gimmick, and took the opportunity to restore it.
And I get it, to an extent. But Moffat had spent a lot of time resolving that and bringing Gallifrey back, and I was looking forward to occasional Time Lord nonsense.
Yeah, the Time Lords were safely tucked away in their pocket universe at the end of time or whatever, they weren't going to pop up all the time anyway. The Doctor would still call themselves "the last Time Lord", even if the Master, the Rani and the Monk were standing next to them...