Football

511 readers

67 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.
No piracy
General Guidelines

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 4 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Arsene Wenger proposes change to offside rule (www.bbc.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lazysoci.al/post/26014933

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The proposed change would move the line to favour aggressive runs, and not disallow being "next to" the defender.

Which would force teams to make those runs not possible by playing in a low block. Defenders are not going to just accept that attackers have a huge advantage over them, you'll have far more "boring" defence that completely shuts down that opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I honestly don't think this would heavily defensive playstyle that heavily. Your major decisions to make as a defender stand between

Deny an area using (threat of) an offside trap.
Follow the running attacker
Position yourself to deny the area by (threatening to) intercepting the ball

No defender is banking on a player with half a foot in offside being caught for it. They either commit to an offside trap, in which case the attacker is usually placed well in offside if they're caught, or they follow the run and try to hinder/stay ahead of the attacker. Nobody is following a run while intentionally staying 15cm behind in the hopes that the attacker will be just slightly offside.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Barcelona has been the most proficient team when it comes to the offside trap this season, but I genuinely don't think they would be able to pull it off with these rules. The offside trap as a tactic would mostly die out. It's simply not feasible when you're disadvantaged by a meter, and a single mistake will likely cost you a goal.

Threatening to intercept/positioning is something all good defenders already do, it's not really an answer.

Following the attacker is a worse solution than already being in an organised low block. Speedy attackers like Haaland or Mbappé will simply outrun most defenders, especially when given a meter headstart, so your best solution would be to not give the space for the run to happen in the first place.

I honestly can't see a way this rule won't lead to teams sitting far deeper defensively, which is the opposite of what most people want. You would directly punish the kind of football Barcelona is currently playing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think my point is that, also with the current rules, you have to make the decision of whether to fall back or commit to an offside trap before the ball is passed. I don't think this change would affect that choice significantly, you're already likely to concede a goal if an offside trap fails.

Of course, most modern defence is built around area denial rather than directly following runs, but once you commit to following a run you don't wait idly for the pass and pray for an offside. I think the game would be played very similarly, but with more hairline-decisions going in the attackers favour.