Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
It would almost certainly snap it's driveshaft upon making contact with the ground, so maybe 15'. There are way too many variables here to come up with any kind of concrete answer, or even much of an educated guess. This would make for a fun mythbusters segment though.
Even if its tires were just 1 mm from the pavement?
The driveshaft wouldn't be snapped from the downward force. It would be snapped because it's happily spinning away at probably a couple of thousand rpm and then suddenly the rear tires make contact (assuming this is a RWD vehicle, otherwise it would be the CV joints breaking for the same reason) and try to get traction and move the car forward, but rubber is made to stick the surfaces and there would be an astounding amount of force applied along the drivetrain that was sped up to 100mph with no resistance suddenly trying to instantly accelerate from 0mph to 100mph with a very considerable amount of resistance.
I don't think the driveshaft rotation would be in the thousands, as the rear diff is a 3:1 ratio, and the wheel diameter further effectively increases the ratio. Driveshafts are suprisingly slowly rotating parts.
But I still agree it would likely fail, as the weakest element in the drive train.
A pretty typical 5th gear transmission ratio is somewhere in the 0.75:1 (engine rpm: transmission output shaft rpm) range, meaning the driveshaft would be rotating at somewhere around (definitely plus or minus) engine rpm. My subaru cruises at 50 at somewhere around the 2k rpm range, so the driveshaft would be spinning at a similar rpm. The diff pinion to ring gear ratio in the differential slows things down quite a bit so your wheels aren't spinning at engine rpm anymore.
Yes