this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
5 points (72.7% liked)
Lemmy.world Support
3202 readers
2 users here now
Lemmy.world Support
Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.
This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.
This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.
You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.
Follow us for server news ๐
Outages ๐ฅ
https://status.lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So for example, I posted a link to some Lemmy growth statistics. I posted the source of them to the URL field, I posted a particular graph to the image field (uploaded from my PC) and then I discussed that particular graph in the body field, as well as a title of course.
Upon hitting submit of course, the Source I thought I was providing had been lost
I have also seen people posting articles a lot where there is a relevant image posted, and the article text or a section of it posted to the body I guess to save people clicks. But then the URL/source is missing so you have no idea where the article actually comes from.
I think this system needs a redesign to make it clear how it functions - like reddit is the same in that you can't have a URL as well as an image so it's not a problem, but when you can input 4 different pieces of information and Lemmy effectively deletes one without letting the user know I don't think that's good design or clear at all.
True, there needs to be a fair amount redesigned. Some things aren't clear and you find out from trial and error. The best way to do what you want though is to use the URL field for what you're wanting to link to. If you want a image visible as well, you have to use the inline image markdown code:
![](image link)
Thanks - yeah I think you're right that would be the best way to handle that if I need to in the future!