this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
233 points (94.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

33942 readers
1710 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess? But it's also morally just to reuse disposables, repair instead of replace, conserve and reduce waste, and delay new purchases as long as possible. I'm doing environmental conservationism just by being poor!

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness. (Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The rich man's boots vs. The poor man's boots. Terry died too damn young.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is the single greatest example I have seen highlighting the problem.

The poor cannot afford to have things that last, things that allow them to think of the future, and hence are stuck in a cycle of debt in the present to near future time periods.

However what I don't understand is how the rich get so short sighted when they have both the motivation and resources to plan for long term outcomes. Doesn't make sense.

Underpaying workers leads to worse productivity and apathy towards your superiors.

Does the world really have so few resources that the only way to keep number go up is to exploit the less fortunate? When will feudalism truly end?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The rich will throw away their perfectly fine boots after a few years because they aren't in style anymore.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

I read “The rich have that opinion.” at first and that somehow fits just as well.