this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38571 readers
394 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ask just about anybody, and they'll tell you that new cars are too expensive. In the wake of tariffs shaking the auto industry and with the Trump administration pledging to kill the federal EV incentive, that situation isn't looking to get better soon, especially for anyone wanting something battery-powered. Changing that overly spendy status quo is going to take something radical, and it's hard to get more radical than what Slate Auto has planned.

Meet the Slate Truck, a sub-$20,000 (after federal incentives) electric vehicle that enters production next year. It only seats two yet has a bed big enough to hold a sheet of plywood. It only does 150 miles on a charge, only comes in gray, and the only way to listen to music while driving is if you bring along your phone and a Bluetooth speaker. It is the bare minimum of what a modern car can be, and yet it's taken three years of development to get to this point.

But this is more than bargain-basement motoring. Slate is presenting its truck as minimalist design with DIY purpose, an attempt to not just go cheap but to create a new category of vehicle with a huge focus on personalization. That design also enables a low-cost approach to manufacturing that has caught the eye of major investors, reportedly including Jeff Bezos. It's been engineered and will be manufactured in America, but is this extreme simplification too much for American consumers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

My two immediate concerns would be whether it comes with AC and is there an AWD option. Both of those could be deal breakers towards the borders. I guess they're not absolute deal breakers (we bounced around AZ in a '71 Datsun pickup that had about the same specs as this a kid) but they certainly would be huge QOL improvements as options.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Ah, cool! Well AC pretty much solves my hesitations here in AZ, lol. But I know a lot of northern states still might want AWD as an option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I live in a country that gets very icy for almost half the year and honestly while AWD is a QoL improvement, it's nowhere near necessary. Good winter tires do so much more for you and RWD gives you more control than FWD at least.

AWD doesn't help you brake better unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I'm very meh on the AWD as someone in the north. Not needed, but a/c is definitely helpful!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Growing up in Phoenix, the national ads in the '80s that breathlessly noted "comes with air conditioning" was like ... how could you sell a car that doesn't have that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, I'm still in AZ, thus my question, haha.