this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

linux4noobs

1891 readers
28 users here now

linux4noobs


Noob Friendly, Expert Enabling

Whether you're a seasoned pro or the noobiest of noobs, you've found the right place for Linux support and information. With a dedication to supporting free and open source software, this community aims to ensure Linux fits your needs and works for you. From troubleshooting to tutorials, practical tips, news and more, all aspects of Linux are warmly welcomed. Join a community of like-minded enthusiasts and professionals driving Linux's ongoing evolution.


Seeking Support?

Community Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm getting ready to switch but there are a few things that I could not figure out how to do optimally. Here's one of those, maybe you can help me with that:

For the past 30 years on Windows when I found a new application I wanted to use I put it in D:\Tools. Almost all applications don't actually need to be installed even if they are only distributed in an installer. That meant that to move my tool collection to a new computer I pull out the D-Drive, mount it in the new computer as D and I'm instantly ready to go.

On Linux there are 2 scenarios flatpak or traditional Package Manager distributions.

For flatpaks putting them on a specific drive seems easy enough.

But how do I handle applications that are not (yet?) available as a flatpak? I tried Nix but decided I'm not ready for that. I could put everything in a bash script but that seems clumsy and would be work to maintain. Is there any other clever way to avoid manually installing my defaults when I updgrade / reinstall my OS?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

[packet manager][list of packages]

Clumsy? How?

Oh, and you don't need to reinstall soft while upgrading adequate Linux distros.

And reinstalling Linux is done once in a decade when some serious changes are here. Like 32->64bit. And even then it isn't necessary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Clumsy? How?

A flat list of 100 packages seems kinda clumsy, I was thinking there must be a way to a file to the package manager, but at least for dnf I didn't find anything on the manpage.

Oh, and you don’t need to reinstall soft while upgrading adequate Linux distros.

Well realistically I'll switch around a bit before finding "my" distro. And considering how I have no idea what I'm doing I'd prefer a clean install when switching.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

If it is for distro hopping, you are better served by liveUSB and virtual machines. Just remember the reason a Linux “distribution” is called that, is because of the package manager and the precise collection of libraries and software packaged for the fresh install and available for distribution on repositories. Managing those is 90% of the work of maintaining a distro. Therefore, your favorite software might not even be available on a different distro's repository. Flatpaks will work everywhere that supports them, but you're at the mercy of the distribution's managers including all of the portals required for desktop and system integration. No package manager I know of accepts a file with a list of packages to install. That's what bash is for, learn basic scripting and that should cover your use case then.