this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
337 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

11368 readers
211 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China's embassy in Washington, D.C., has shared an image contrasting the country's rail infrastructure with that of the United States in a pointed jab at Beijing's rival amid simmering trade tensions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey hey, we have shit rail infrastructure also.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait seriously? I guess yeah I've never seen rail when I've been in NZ, does the land not really accommodate or something?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So many reasons.

But smallish population and a big distance between major population centers means rail is expensive. Relative to population size.

But also the government (for the last 40 years) hasn't prioritized investment in rail. It is always roads, always.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But smallish population and a big distance between major population centers means rail is expensive. Relative to population size.

This is also true for roads. Prioritizing roads is ideologically motivated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

would airports be better? they have better max distance per cost figures, but are more expensive per passenger.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Flying doesn't need as much infrastructure so that's definitely a factor. I couldn't find the cost per passenger kilometer to compare so I can only say that flying emits much more co2 than every other form of transportation. Since climate change is going to cost us a lot I'd say the cost of flying exceeds the costs of car resp. train infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

roads and rail also emit co2 though, and require regular maintenance that emits still more. at some point (perhaps it would be less than a flight per year) flying would emit less than the maintenance of infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I guess I get it, that still sucks.