this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
645 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

68812 readers
5205 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter (now X) and Square (now Block), sparked a weekend’s worth of debate around intellectual property, patents, and copyright, with a characteristically terse post declaring, “delete all IP law.”

X’s current owner Elon Musk quickly replied, “I agree.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 152 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (18 children)

Do it., but also ensure that all work enters the public domain and is free for anyone to use, modify, commercialize, or basically whatever the GPL says.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (14 children)

That's what would happen if copyright doesn't exist. If a company releases something, it's immediately public domain, because no law protects it.

GPL

The GPL is very much not the public domain.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's an interesting point that without any IP law, GPL would be invalid and corporations could use and modify things like Lemmy without complying with the license.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. They wouldn't be obligated to contribute back at all, so someone like Meta could just rebrand Lemmy into something else and throw ads everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They already could. Lemmy's users are not the ones who run the software. It's like Google's usage of Linux. They can keep their changes to themselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

They can only keep them to themselves if they don't distribute the changes. Since Google distributes Android, they need to release their changes to Linux on Android under the GPL. Since they don't distribute their server code, they don't need to share their changes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But then corporations could not stop anyone from modifying their modifications to things like Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, they wouldn't need to release those changes publicly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

But then anyone could take them anyway.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)