this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
21 points (92.0% liked)
Privacy
5762 readers
16 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is a concern about a remote employer detecting that they're working from outside the USA, not surveillance. TOR is not an appropriate solution.
They are going to find out regardless. Stop trying to cheat the system as that's crazy in so many ways.
The system already cheats us. It's literally designed to.
But yeah, they'll find out at some point if they're really looking.
It is bold to criticize the system while actively trying to commit fraud.
As long as you were paying taxes to the US, the state, and the county you're working in, I'm not sure who would have standing to claim fraud.
You'd get fired for sure.
And I personally would never do it. But I also have no sympathy for corporations making wacky rules.
Probably not. This is the sort of organization that will do the bare minimum to tick a compliance checkbox and no more. That likely includes IP geolocation and maybe checks against well-known datacenter IPs. It's very unlikely to include latency checks, and does not include monitoring agents on remote machines. My friends have accepted there's some risk of employment loss, but would prefer to mitigate it.
Fuck the system.
You are talking about fraud. I'm not about to help you commit a crime. If a company wanted someone from abroad they wouldn't restrict it to US only.
I couldn't care less what the employer wants. This almost certainly doesn't violate any criminal laws, but could lead to loss of employment.
I care that my friends can be somewhere they're physically safe while making enough money to be OK.