this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
827 points (98.5% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
6889 readers
325 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just noticed if you also decrease something by 10%, then increase by 10%, you also get a net loss of 1. Math itself is biased towards loss.
Anyone convinced in the malevolent creator theory yet?
Math isn't biased. Flawed reasoning is. For x ≠ 0
The correct way to cancel scaling by a proportion is its reciprocal, ie, for x ≠ 0
A 10% decrease is ⁹⁄₁₀
Its reciprocal is ¹⁰⁄₉, a ¹⁄₉ = 11¹⁄₉% increase
We make it complicated by stating increase/decrease & percent instead of simple scaling factors. The western world has a weird 💯 fetish almost as funny as ancient mesopotamians and the number 60.
In general, for proportional change x, the proportional change y to cancel it is the solution of
Increase by 10 then decrease by 10. Same problem. Math is lossy.
Adding flat numbers is different from adding a percent.