this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
108 points (96.6% liked)

Games

18727 readers
447 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It has an SSD sized on the assumption that games go in the slot. It has an SSD that's the price of a game, and will only hold a dozen. And they could probably get away with less, thanks to focusing on the negligible cost of a hole and some pins.

Nintendo is only now figuring out that Virtual Console purchases should be transferable... at all. They are not qualified to handle a digital-only console. I think the idea of deleting a game and re-downloading it, for free, was a recent surprise to some of these people. The same way Sony's still trying to repeat the PS2, Nintendo's been trying to repeat the Famicom Disk System.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Have you contemplated the costs of slot + game cards vs. SSD?

They are not qualified to handle a digital-only console

I mean they're one of the most profitable companies in the business. There's no reason they couldn't become qualified...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They could.

They haven't.

They won't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well I never tried to speculate what they were going to do...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Commenting on what they're doing right now is not meaningfully different. This started with you second-guessing their commitment to cartridges.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're mistaken. My statement was simply that it was wild that they were still doing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Distinction without difference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My guy, if remarking that it's "crazy" isn't commentary on whether it makes sense, what is it?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

My guy, commenting on what makes sense is not the same thing as speculating about what they're going to do or second guessing their commitment to cartridges.

Anything else you'd like to make up?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My apologies for remembering the words you wrote.

If you don't like speculation, don't say things like "there’s no reason they couldn’t become qualified." Because that, in itself, is speculation. As surely as calling this situation "crazy" is commentary on whether it makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because that, in itself, is speculation.

🤣 No it's not.

Have a nice night.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

"They can" isn't, but "they can't" is.

Sure dude.