this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
39 points (88.2% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

1173 readers
59 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

it's on the OPINION section. it's okay to not agree with it, they want to have opinions expressed, usually not the norm, so you can have a better formed option about the subject

if you read it and think "that's stupid bullshit!"

you might come to the conclusion the editor wants.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I don't necessarily disagree that that may be the intention, but "We're going to platform apologia for a fascist's policies so you can see how stupid it is" is, I feel, at the very least a severe strategic miscalculation.

[–] Isoprenoid 2 points 2 weeks ago

they want to have opinions expressed, usually not the norm, so you can have a better formed option about the subject

You can't a better formed opinion on a subject by reading trash.

GIGO

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but someone whose opinion is that ants are tiny robots doesn’t belong in the opinion section. I think this is on about that level.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but someone whose opinion is that ants are tiny robots doesn’t belong in the opinion section.

What's wrong with that tho

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe there would be a big improvement to be had to the quality of the paper and the engagement, if it came with the right framing.

In a box on page 1: “One story in this paper is fake! Can you spot it? Write to (blah) with your guess and your reasons” and then see what people come up with and publish some of the letters with responses. Get people in a more healthy frame of mind for how to interact with the material.

(Bonus points if there is no fake story in most issues)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No I mean what's wrong with ants as robots

I'm 100% embracing this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol okay fair point let me rephrase

someone whose opinion is that ants are tiny robots sent by the Koreans to spy on us and we all need to step on them all the time

That is more bizarre than what’s in this article but they are based in roughly the same level of factual rigor and connection to reality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

If I beg the ants to liberate us, will the Koreans hear me?