this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
Economics
726 readers
16 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I actually watched the speech and one bit I found to be quite interesting is that he said if the two sides of the Mandate conflict they will deal with the side that is out of whack the most. So if unemployment were to massively increase, they would cut interest rates and accept a slightly higher inflation to bring the unemployment down. And if inflation went crazy and the jobs market was only slightly affected, they would raise interest rates until the inflation came back down.
That seems reasonable. It's also possible for both high inflation and high unemployment. In that case he'd be like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Based on his comment yesterday, he would find out which one is moving faster in the wrong direction and be more aggressive on that side of the mandate. If they are both rising, but one is rising faster than the other, then he would focus on that side first.