this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
722 points (98.8% liked)

Facepalm

3033 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep, was gonna post this.

Good luck, this hospital's IT department, good fucking luck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They don't need it. 802.11x. Problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

... Can you expand on what you mean by that?

Are you saying just... firewall all the Echoes, lock them out of any ability to access the actual internet?

So they never phone home?

I mean... yeah I guess that could work, if you took the time to manually do custom firmware updates on them in some way that only involves your local (hospital) intranet... and overrides the default proprietary firmware and basically flashes it with some custom system that doesn't rely on AWS connections to work... if... that even exists...

Their hospital oriented implementation... was... reliant on a constant AWS connection to actually process voice recordings, transform them into text or some other digital format, then send that back to the hospital, "securely."

https://www.hipaajournal.com/amazon-ends-support-for-third-party-hipaa-eligible-alexa-skills/

Apparently they actually lost HIPAA compliance back in 22.

If they are literally just a being used as an intercomm system... why would you even use Echoes?

There are tons of other, actually HIPAA compliant, hospital oriented, digital intercomm software systems and manufacturers.

Seriously, please explain to me how '802.11x', a term that means 'all wifi standards', somehow solves the problem of Echoes being non HIPAA compliant, requiring constant access to Amazon servers to actually process the raw audio...

Please elaborate.