United States | News & Politics

2722 readers

1286 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Trump says he is not joking about third presidential term (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Republican President Donald Trump said on Sunday he was not joking about seeking a third presidential term, which is barred by the U.S. Constitution, but that it was too early to think about doing so.

Trump, who took office on January 20 for his second, non-consecutive White House term, has made vague allusions to seeking a third one but addressed it directly on Sunday in a telephone interview with NBC News.

"No, I'm not joking. I’m not joking," Trump said, but "it is far too early to think about it." "There are, there are methods which you could do it, as you know," he said. He declined to elaborate on any specific methods.

U.S. presidents are limited to two four-year terms, consecutive or not, according to the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Source on that one? Would be glad to see it but so far as I know there are listed requirements for president but not VP. My thinking is the phrasing about 'be elected' as a technicality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the final paragraph of the 12th amendment

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A good backstop, just being one who's read a pile of weasel worded legal docs I could see someone argue that the parameters to 'be' president (right age, natural born citizen) are distinct from the ability to be 'elected' president, but that's the kind of shifty logic I could see the SCOTUS using to allow it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's pretty cut and dry. Most if not all states would not even put him on the ballot and the right would have to fight to explain why this doesn't say exactly what it says.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Samuel Alito: "Challenge accepted!"