this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1538 points (92.4% liked)

memes

13912 readers
2702 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ulterno 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

then aren’t you admitting that so far you haven’t known the answer?

That's the point of science. Humility and requestioning yourself everytime someone gives new input, instead of sticking to some old text that some human wrote and multiple other humans over a long period of time, translated; all using lossy translation techniques.

This mentality is similar to what you will see from many people in places of power (no matter how small), trying to evade criticism using the same social power that they need to be responsible about. Just that in case of religion, one has found a scapegoat, so unassailable that it can be reused indefinitely.

You can see, which approach is more desirable by simply considering the following facet of the result that we have when we have a science majority vs a religion majority...

  • In times when religious organisations were in power, those who criticised them were killed and their works destroyed to as much of an extent as possible
  • In times when scientific thought was prevalent (scientific organisations don't get social power owing to their lack of charisma, which stems from the very basic attribute of the modern philosophy of science - that one can be wrong) the religious organisations criticising science are not destroyed until almost extinction, but are allowed to question all results and have the opportunity to aggregate their views.
    • You will always see some kind of religion vs another
    • You might see "science-ism" vs some other religion
    • You will see political orgs (which represent one of the peaks of social power in the current age) vs some politico-religional orgs trying to destroy and silence the other
    • You will not see science trying to silence a religion
    • You will see businessmen trying to use scientific results as a stepladder to social power. You will also see them fail in the long term, simply due to the nature of science.
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, religion is based on faith and history (but at a certain point falls back on faith since you aren't there in the past), and science should be based on empirical evidence. So both realms can't operate exactly the same, although they can cross over.

Many people do research on many faiths, and their research convinces them that a particular one is correct. They can live the rest of their life believing that particular faith is correct, and stick with it, even if they are open to being proven wrong.

And with science, if you actually prove something true, you do not have to act as though you have not. Now, if you only have a theory, then yes, you should be questioning it until it can be proven. I think modern science has disregarded the scientific method as not required anymore to make claims about what we "know".

[–] ulterno -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think modern science has disregarded the scientific method as not required anymore to make claims about what we “know”.

Yeah, that's one of the pretty big problems I see happening in the current scenario.
People becoming way more hand-wavy about having been proven wrong, which sometimes seems (we can't know whether it actually is) outright disingenuous.

The religion related scenario I painted was probably possible due to how long it lasted. Maybe we will have to wait for this one to last long enough to know whether what it yields is as undesirable or more.
For now, at least I don't see it going in the same direction as the religion power, simply because it's not the science people that are holding power, but other politics oriented ones. So if it were to go in an undesirable direction in the far future, it would have to be in some other direction.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think both religion and science have taken a back seat to just plain ol' greed and power.

[–] ulterno 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The science guys will always do science.
Even if the patronages stop.
Even if other's start killing them for it.
Even if the whole society calls them a heretic.
The quest for truth defines them.


Just don't mistake them for science bros