this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
153 points (81.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1139 readers
86 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 


Edit: Even MBFC rates dropsitenews as a reliable source https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drop-site-news-bias-and-credibility/

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

There is no rule about 'blog sites' on worldnews. Jordanlund has made this up and proceeds to classify anything he does not like as a 'blog '.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A lot of people complain about MBFC, but when I ask them "Great, show me a source they say is questionable that is not and I'll stop using it."

Silence.

Generally people get hung up over what they flag as right or left and that doesn't enter into our decisions on whether to remove a post or not. Right/Left/Center doesn't matter as long as it's a reliable source and that's one thing MBFC does that Ad Fontes does not.

"But, but, it can't be 'Right' AND 'Reliable'!"

Sure it can, look at National Review, which has been the gold standard for conservative thought for decades.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Great, show me a source they say is questionable that is not and I’ll stop using it.”

Al Jazeera and MSNBC. They both have the same factual rating as the New York Post, for transparently ridiculous reasons.

If by "questionable," you mean "unreliable and thus forbidden for posting," I'm not aware of one, although I could search. Would it make a difference?

The other side of the question -- a source they say is unquestionable which in fact is highly questionable -- is even worse. They produce an objective degradation in the quality of /c/world by allowing garbage sources like Newsweek (which they rate "mostly factual," a tick above both MSNBC and Al Jazeera.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well this is a straight up massive lie. You have been provided with a ton of examples in the past by many different users. Including many times in this very community.