this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
1908 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

14389 readers
1750 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1908
Depart, men of education. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
135 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

In the context of Dawkins meme, this post is definitely a meme!

idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning

If we consider scientists imitating the behavior of other scientists (ex: leaving the us) combined with the social network post (signifying the symbolic meaning), it checks all the correct boxes to me!

Would another peer review my analysis?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Reviewer 2, checking in. Let's see...

☑️ Technically correct (the best kind of correct).
☑️ Dawkins framework applied... adequately.
☑️ "Symbolic meaning" not entirely reductionist. Surprising.

However:

  • Citation deficiency detected. [Fossilesque et al., 2023] must be invoked 2–3 times for rigor.
  • "Imitating scientists" lacks nuance. Did you consider the Fossilesque Paradox of Academic Exodus? (Spoiler: You didn’t. Cite (Fossilesque, 2024, 2025 in press.).

Verdict:
Pending compliance with adequate attribution. Then, and only then, shall this review ascend to a grudging "pass."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow this is amazing satire! You made my day (even though it already was a very good one)!

Your critique is quite constructive. Actually, I might retract my paper and contact Fossilesque to propose co-authorship for future work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Looks good to me