this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
92 points (85.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

954 readers
273 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Context:

The article in question was well sourced, factually accurate, and written by a well-renowned author and journalist whose work appears elsewhere too, regardless of which outlet published it.

Nonetheless, Jordan Lund is once again blindly trusting a pro-zionist conservative outlet masquerading as a bias and fact checker that nothing from anywhere that criticizes the fascist apartheid regime can be reliable 🤦

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Shitty sources get removed, full stop.

The author doesn't enter into it.

The quality of the article doesn't enter into it.

We aren't giving traffic to them. Or Fox, or Newsmax or Oann, or, etc. etc. etc.

If you don't like that, feel free to post elsewhere, we have higher standards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Shitty sources get removed, full stop.

The author doesn't enter into it.

The quality of the article doesn't enter into it.

That's a bullshit policy and if you didn't have your "this is how I do it because this is the way I do it" blinders on, you might understand that.

We aren't giving traffic to them

You ARE aware that a lot of publishers, ESPECIALLY ones that don't worry enough about quality and reliability, look at number of impressions when deciding what kind of things to post more of, right?

By keeping people away from something GOOD they post, you're giving Mint a perverse incentive to post less quality journalism about Gaza and more of the kinds that IS bullshit but gets more clicks.

If you don't like that, feel free to post elsewhere,

I will.

~~we~~ I have ~~higher~~ arbitrary and counterproductive standards.

Fixed it for you.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

No, because if we allow one source that's questionable, then the next time this comes up it will be "But, but, you allowed this other bullshit source, why not miiiiiiiine??!???" We aren't opening that door.

We went over this with the legit journalist posting from Substack. Don't care, Substack isn't a source.

Read what other people are telling you in this very thread, YDI.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, because if we allow one source that's questionable, then the next time this comes up it will be "But, but, you allowed this other bullshit source, why not miiiiiiiine??!???" We aren't opening that door.

We all already knew youre a dog shit mod, Jordy, but if you're really too stupid to know how to respond to that then you should definitely be stripped of any responsibility IRL and digitally

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

It's not a slippery slope when he's a living example of what I'm talking about.

"Buuuut my bullshit source is special! I'm different!"

No it isn't, and no you aren't. I swear, we need an alternate community to PTB - call it WLB - Whiny Little Bitches.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No, because if we allow one source that's questionable, then the next time this comes up it will be "But, but, you allowed this other bullshit source, why not miiiiiiiine??!???" We aren't opening that door.

Holy slippery slope fallacy, Batman! 🙄

Read what other people are telling you in this very thread, YDI.

I have, and most either agree with me or disagree based on the irrelevant point you keep harping on.

Rigidly dogmatic mods such as yourself is the reason why most people from other instances avoid .world when possible.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 hours ago

Use a better source and you won't have this problem. For now?