Star Trek

1469 readers

1 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Star Trek is canonically socialist according to Strange New Worlds (youtu.be)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27135964

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You get you’re in a starfleet sub right, we’re 100% talking about storylines. It doesn’t change anything either way but still.

you get that we can have discussions and make comments that don't directly relate to any storylines, right?

Point to where I said I do not support socialist politicians. I’ll wait, I imagine your incredible lack of imagination led you to believe the example of cognitive dissonance in my original comment was my actual opinion…

So you're saying this isn't your opinion? How am I supposed to know that? This is something you could have clarified in the earlier post where i quoted it.

“that society is ideal but I don’t like anyone that would being about that society"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

We could, in this instance we weren't though.

Duh, it's literally not what I said if you read what I wrote.

“that society is ideal but I don’t like anyone that would being about that society"

That's an example of cognitive dissonance with correct context, and it's fun to know I was right and that your lack of imagination or reading comprehension led you to believe an example was an opinion. I'm not gonna call you dumb for it but I am going to imply that pursuing this conversation and doubling down would be stupid especially if you decide to delve into my comment history.