Games

1673 readers

14 users here now

█▓▒░📀☭ g a m e s 💾⚧░▒▓█

Tag game recommendations with [rec]. Tag your critique or commentary threads with [discussion]. Both table-top and video game content is welcome! Original content or indie/DRM free material is encouraged!

Not a place for gamer gate talk or other reactionary behavior. TERFs and incels get the wall.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Bummed out about Civ VII (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

That's all. Played Civ since IV and the boardgame-like nature of it meant that I've gotten a lot of friends and family into it as a means to experience video games in general.

Civ VII looks really bad, even if I haven't played it myself. Systems upon systems that aren't properly explained, that somehow feel both cluttered and less in-depth than previous entries. Three truncated games making up the segments of one larger game is lame, too. A bad solution to the problem of people burning out in the later eras.

Most of all, though, is the business model of it all. Civ already leaned into 4X DLC conventions which meant getting the whole package was an expensive endeavor, but at least, for example, Civ VI had just two major expansion packs. Civ VII is already drowning into microtransaction leader purchases.

And then there's, just, the price. It's obscene. Denuvo is devastating to see as it creates a lot of barriers to giving the thing a try. I don't get excited for games any more, but Civ VII would have been one of them.

Anyone try it themselves? Anyone in love? Anyone feel like me?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Chairman Mao was a leader once, and they recently had Theodore Roosevelt and Haile Selassie, both from the 20th century. So there is precedent, but China already got their 1 leader so you better wait for 3 more French leaders before that DLC.