this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
467 points (88.6% liked)

Political Memes

5998 readers
2702 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have problems with people who abstained. The hard thing is, how do you change voter behavior?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

This push to demonize the strawman protest voters is an ongoing propaganda campaign to cause poor people to infight.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Strawman?

6.27 Million more people voted for Biden in 2020 than Harris in 2024. That's not strawmanning, those fuckers stayed home and that is exactly why we are in the current situation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Or worse, to exacerbate racial tensions, is one possibility I fear.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah. I thought this sort of shit would've been cut down after those CIA layoffs trump did or whatever, or, that's what everyone's been jokingly saying, at least. Probably it's more along the lines that social media companies keep selectively propagating this shit because they're a revolving door with those three letter agencies anyways. Saw a LOT of black liberals posting with starbucks cups and mcdonald's after the election, and talking about how they want to buy beachfront property in gaza, because the michigan vote didn't come through for Kamala. Most of those people probably weren't conforming to the boycott in the first place, and more broadly didn't give a shit at all, but still, incredibly harrowing stuff, there.

Anyways yeah I agree with the other guy, if you wanted to spurn discussion, you probably would've been better off posting some shit that's not like, immediately just blaming the protest votes? Is in better faith more generally? Probably wouldn't gain as much traction exclusively because of that, as is the case with the site, but you'd at least not be contributing to that sort of bad faith discussion as much, which I think the initial post is doing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you agree with them, then why did you post this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

it's generating productive discussion

also there's nothing really to "agree" with or not; it's a question only and I have been doing my best not to come down with immediate judgement toward those answering the question

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Gives some serious "just asking questions" vibes.

The image definitely provides a pretty clear perspective. People seem to be reacting to either agreeing or disagreeing with that perspective. Why is the main focus on those that abstained rather than on those that voted Trump? I don't really see any productive conversations happening. Just the same people reiterating the same talking points. The data makes it clear that Gaza was not a big issue for voters, and no one is really going to change their mind on either side of that even if it WAS the deciding factor in the election. This seems like a distraction and a great way to sow division.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

It isn't a straw man, it is observation .

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

Well, no, because I've been asking myself the same question for a while now. And I don't have that agenda. Lol