this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

Switzerland

727 readers
2 users here now

All things Switzerland!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Federal Court has confirmed refusals to grant a Swiss television journalist access to files on Crypto, the now defunct encryption machine firm at the heart of a spying scandal.

The scandal, which came to light in February 2020, involved manipulated encryption devices made by Zug-based firm Crypto which the CIA and the German intelligence agency used to spy on half the world.

At the end of October 2019, the journalist requested access to files from the Federal Archives dating from the 1990s relating to the Crypto probe carried out by the Federal Police at the time. The Federal Intelligence Service (FIS) and then Swiss Export Risk Insurance (SERI) refused her access to three of the four files on grounds that there were overriding public interests at stake.

After the Federal Administrative Court in 2021 and 2022, the Federal Court confirmed the refusals in two rulings published on Friday. It points out that these documents mention by name informants from foreign intelligence services and the countries to which coding machines were delivered. In this respect, Switzerland's interest in maintaining secrecy remains intact, it said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Um, how about blackening the names?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which names? Did we read a different article?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the Federal Court confirmed the refusals in two rulings published on Friday. It points out that these documents mention by name informants from foreign intelligence services and the countries to which coding machines were delivered. In this respect, Switzerland's interest in maintaining secrecy remains intact, it said.

The federal archive should just blacken the names and then give the documents.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Got it, thanks for clarifying.