Rust

6274 readers

10 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Auto debloat unused pub items from dependencies. (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/rust

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I shaved off 10 MiB from my binary in 2 hours!

I made a program using Macroquad, then I built it in release mode, the binary was 63 MiB in size.

So I used cargo vendor to have a better look at Macroquad and one of its dependencies, glam.

I then started to delete code, like, lots and lots of code(about 30_000 lines of code); none of it affected my main project, some of it became 'dead_code' just by removing the pub keyword.

The result is that my project was unaffected and the binary went down to 52 MiB.

Is there a way to automate removal of unneeded elements from dependencies? This is potentially huge.

EDIT: I FIGURED IT OUT!!!

My mistake was measuring the size of "target/release", I discovered that that folder contains many "unnecessary" files, like "deps", which greatly bloat the folder'r size, the actual size of my binary is 864K.

I am so relieved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KillTheMule 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Actually, dead code eliminination should do the trick, if you're compiling a binary at least (same for a library I think, but there could be re-exports there). Did you compile in release mode?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The compiler doesn't consider it to be dead code since it's marked pub.

[–] KillTheMule 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but isn't this in a dependency? Can't be reached when only importing your crate anyways? And if you're building a binary, I don't think this could really considered exported, is what I mean :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yes that's exactly what I want. The compiler should stop considering it accessible.

load more comments (3 replies)