this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)
Cybersecurity
6136 readers
64 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Notable mention to [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This actually has nothing to do with the fastHTTP library, other than it happens to be the library they use.
Sounds like a classic brute force attempt, which happened to have a 9.7% success rate.
Whether this is bad config on behalf of the user, or bad config on behalf of Azure isn't really clear.
Regardless, the fault is with Azure for not mitigating this and providing a secure-by-default service.
I can't believe 10% of users deliberately weakened their security settings.
The article does mention MFA fatigue. I guess where so many "type in the code"/"is this you" type prompts resulted in the user just accepting (or worse, accepting by force of habit) to get rid of them.
Unexpected MFA and security alerts should be investigated immediately.