this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

1 readers
0 users here now

01010111 01100101 01101100 01100011 01101111 01101101 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111 01100111 01110010 01100001 01101101 01101101 01101001 01101110 01100111 00101100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 01110011 01100101 01101100 01100110 00100000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101000 01101111 01101101 01100101 00101110

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
10 Reasons Not To Use Rust (The Whole Truth) (m.youtube.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The troll is strong with this one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The list

  1. Bad for job security. The code has no bugs so you can't get paid to fix them.
  2. moves to slow, No null, instead forcing you to use options.
  3. moves to fast. (Now we know for sure this list is a joke)
  4. Too opinionated. Everyone uses the same tool cargo
  5. Not opinionated enough. To many versions of libs
  6. Dangerous to democracy. to easy to use other code. communism
  7. Not inclusive enough. Sex offenders not allowed in rust forums and chats
  8. bad for the economy. Rust runs fine on old hardware so you don't need to buy new stuff.
  9. Bad for the environment. to long to compile new crates when we could use that cpu power to mine crypto currency.
  10. Bad for security researchers. with c or c++ you can just see errors but with rust you can't find any.

I think a legit reason would be,

My current garbage collected program language works well for my task. I don't need the speed of rust. And instead want a language that isn't so verbose that packs so much into a single line of code like rust does.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I got a good chuckle out of it.