this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
5 points (56.8% liked)

Technology

34877 readers
40 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are really 7nm chips that are designed using a different approach, but have similar characteristics. It's kind amusing how people think that there's something magical involved in making these types of chips that would prevent China from making them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think hes not questioning it because china, but because nm between different fabs isnt comparible. E.g. finfet nm isnt the true nm used by older definitions of what nm means, which is why intel for instance, changed their naming on its fab process to match the rest of the industry. (E.g "Intel 7" is actually a well processed 10nm traditional definition chip that has that name because its conparible to TSMC 7nm)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

We'll see what the performance is like when the chips start making their way to the market.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is. The uv lithography that China cannot buy is literally the magic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

TSMC N7, N7P and Intel 7 don't use EUV. It's all quad patterned DUV. DUV lithography has been in use since the 1990s going from 800nm to N7P.

Every single node after TSMC's so called 16nm has been all marketing. It would've more accurate to call TSMC 16FF as 20nm FinFET. This is why Intel brands what they themselves called 10nm as Intel 7 to bring their marketing more in line with TSMC's.

SMIC N+1 has a density of 89 million of transistors per mm² while TSMC N7 has 91.2. TSMC 10FF and Samsung 10LPP only offer slightly more than half that density.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I literally linked an article explaining that China uses an alternative approach with chiplets. Maybe go read it. Also, it's not like China can't develop DUV themselves, or just hire people who already developed it to build it for them. There is no magic here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tell me you don't understand modern chip manufacturing without saying you don't understand modern chip manufacturing.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess we'll find out who actually understands modern chip manufacturing when these phones come out won't we mr. modern chip manufacturing understander.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've already given my prediction. They'll be marketed as 7nm and have the power/performance profiles of 11nm+