this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
86 points (98.9% liked)

Gaming

30618 readers
133 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's still some Vsauce level reaching that "we don't actually even see anything". The tech doesn't matter when playing and if it looks blurry, then it is blurry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The tech changes things completely. There are practical examples in other comments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I said that it doesn't matter. Only the end result does. There is no game I would play on a CRT simply because it looks worse. It's not an objective fact but my preference. I don't care how you are trying achieve the "CRT look" since it looks like shit and I don't want to see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Have you checked the examples...? I feel like we're going in circles. There are cases where the CRT looks objectively better, supporting examples have been provided, technical explanation has been provided... it's up to you to look at them or not.

If you wish to discusd some of the examples, or the tech, I'm open to that. Otherwise I'll leave it here. ✌️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is no "looks objectively better" since it's a subjective thing. I've seen those examples multiple times and they look as blurry as ever.

What makes you push this tech to these limits?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The objective part is in whether it matches what the creator intended.

Sometimes they intended crisp contours, like in ClearType; sometimes they intended to add extra colors; sometimes they designed pixel perfect and it looked blurry on CRT; very rarely they used vector graphics or 3D that can be rendered at better quality by just throwing some extra resolution.

Many artists of the time pushed this tech to these limits, "objectively better" is to emulate that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's not better. That's more accurate. Is preference really this foreign of a concept to you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you call this "preference", then there's nothing to talk about. Like printing the Mona Lisa on toilet paper and calling it a "preference".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

That looks bad sure but I wouldn't look at that closely anyway and the filtered one looks even worse. I have played that game without any filters and I didn't get any urges to use any. I have also played it on CRT but there wasn't any choice back then.