this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
260 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39409 readers
1996 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

To me inheritance is the fairest thing to tax. Everything should go to the state at death.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn’t this incentivize the state causing more death and individuals not wanting to improve their property/business if they can’t choose who gets it after they pass?

[–] ilega_dh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

What??? That’s the craziest shit I’ve heard today, that would mean any country with universal healthcare would be incentivized to kill their citizens as soon as possible because it saves money.

Judging by life expectancy, this is not the case.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That would destroy a lot of family business like farms.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not if they made it a point to split ownership with those alive before they died. Its not really all that hard its mostly a greed and control thing. Farm with two parents and three kids could have each parent with a 35% ownership stake and 10% for each kid but if both parents died it would be a severe tax day. If they did 20% a piece then if the kids were older they could buy out what was left and the parents could sell of theirs as they got older to avoid the tax. That being said I could see some allowed inheritance level like a million.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

At least in Finland you can't give tax free gifts over a small amount. So you can't give part of your company to your children beforehand. The only way things like family farms can be inherited is that at least some part of inheritances is tax free.

Not to mention that farms are usually run by one family. Hard to imagine siblings wanting to live and work on the same farm together.

These are difficult issues. I don't think we can figure out a perfect system, we are going to have to live with flaws.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It really is, the best kind of inheritance tax is a progressive one that is zero until a person inherits the equivalent of a median apartment.

This tax is politically tricky though because it's an emotionally charged topic that is easy to get people riled up. Think "Labor is taxed, financial gains are taxed, gas is taxed, products are taxed, retirement income is taxed and death is taxed also?" vibes.

There is also a question of farmers since you need a farm of a certain size to be competitive and that's usually land that's worth a lot of money. It'll basically make it impossible to transition individual farmers between generations since they're always just barely getting by and surely not going to be able to afford the tax.

The Brits added an exemption for farmland and the rich use it as a loophole now.

I say fuck it, redistribution once per generation is really good for the economy.