this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
702 points (94.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9794 readers
198 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

People on bikes may be rude and may not follow the rules, but can't be aggressive.

When a man with a .45 meets a man with a rifle, the man with a pistol will be a dead man.

Original stripe from the Onion: https://www.theonion.com/bum-rush-hour-1846606314

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113615912203015089

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you realize that not everyone is as healthy/strong as the average man. do you really want an elderly person or a chronically ill person subjected to a head on collision ?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they don't want to smash into things, they can drive to the conditions. Their cars have lights, it's just a matter of using them properly by driving at an appropriate speed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the 'conditions' dont include a maniac camouflaging dangerous objects to purposely make innocent people crash.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they didn't smash into the bin, then sooner or later they'd risk smashing people instead. Drag would rather bins be run over than people. They won't be innocent when their reckless driving gets someone killed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually, I agree! We should also shoot dead drug users and lowlifes... otherwise they're going to hurt someone eventually!

See more.../s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Letting reckless drivers run over a bin won't cause any deaths unless they're going fast enough to turn a pedestrian into red paint. For all real world cases, it'll simply be a bit of self-inflicted property damage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

okay. i suppose a more similar comparison would be the police distributing laced weed (or other drugs, if weed is legal where u live). it only hurts the druggies who are reckless enough to take drugs, right ?

you are also forgetting the fact that a painted bin will still be an inconvenience for the well-intentioned driver. you arent making it better for them. you are only making it detrimental to those who dont react in time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It'll be better for responsible drivers. They can just drive around it easily once they see it, and they won't have to share the road with reckless drivers, because the reckless drivers will have cars with smashed fronts. That's a few seconds in exchange for possibly saving their lives.

And it's not the same as laced weed, because smoking weed doesn't hurt anyone, and laced weed does. Reckless driving kills people, and black brick bins don't. It's the opposite way around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but weed can hurt you. it wont always. maybe it is unlikely even. but it can. same with reckless driving. if it were 100% chance u would die, people wouldnt do it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

You're talking about weed hurting the smoker, but drag is talking about reckless driving hurting helpless bystanders. Those aren't the same.