this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1938 readers
454 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

“Effectively, what he’s saying is that even though there’s a guarantee of birthright citizenship,” explains Evan Bernick, an assistant professor of law at Northern Illinois University and co-author of The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment: Its Letter and Spirit, “the president can kind of turn it off by declaring an invasion and try to remove whoever he says is invading…It’s not even a loophole, it swallows the entire guarantee.” The fact that Trump referred to a foreign invasion in his campaign video, he adds, suggests they might be anticipating litigation and trying to “boost as much as possible their very minimal odds.”

This is an extraordinarily dangerous approach. He'll basically be declaring them to be enemy combatants. That means he can involve the military. That means he can declare protesters to be giving "aid and comfort" to enemies, and charge them with treason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

And this is how it will start.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago

Gosh… an unfettered imperial presidency using a pretext to revoke a person’s citizenship…

So anyone who ever donated to … oh say… not him, could suddenly be stateless?

I’m sure I’m over reacting, and I don’t want to “slippery slope “ but isn’t that a reasonable reading of his statement?