this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1938 readers
887 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One reason to do something like this would be if you were planning to disrupt the international supply chain by perhaps putting tariffs on China, keeping local unions happy to the point where they would not jump on a chance to strike during a supply chain disruption would be an effective way to minimize the adverse effects of tariffs and wars for that matter.

You could also just read this as an appeal to union members who voted for Trump to keep them a part of the Republican coalition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wtf is with them using the word "taps". Not blaming you OP, it's clearly in the article's title. But I see it over and over and over again.

Not isolated, every time the stock market loses 2% is "plummets" or "plunges". Every time a fighter jet is sent to intercept something, it's "scrambled."

Like they all use the same lexicon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As far as I'm aware, "taps" is a sports reference. As in, to tap somebody in.

Your other complaints aren't related.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought it referred to the colloquialism "a tap on the shoulder," but I looked that up on DDG and apparently it means "a request to resign." That's the opposite of what I inferred.

Suddenly, a John Scalzi book I recently read and which overused the phrase makes a lot more sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The sports reference could also mean to tap out, like in wrestling. I suppose the answer you got is pretty well in line with that