Hardware
A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
view the rest of the comments
I'm a bit of a noob in hardware design, so maybe this is a stupid question, but why is a FPGA scary?
It would seem scarier to me if they actually fabbed an FPGA into an ASIC right? That could maybe indicate they have some kinda plan to mass-produce them, no?
Just that whatever the technological threshold for being included in the sanctions is, every Xilinx chip is complex/advanced/high-performance enough that it would definitely meet it. In other words, unlike with TI chips, you can tell just from the brand name that Russia is definitely not supposed to have it.
Practically speaking, an FPGA could be acting as anything from an encrypted transceiver to a flight controller to an AI coprocessor. Regardless, though, it'd be a relatively complex unit of functionality -- one of the more important chips in the drone, and therefore one of the more important to deny to Russia.