this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
382 points (98.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8607 readers
543 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you can't really blame the manufacturers for this, either. They can't reasonably continue maintaining software for their products for an indefinite period of time.

Shh, anytime I say this about Windows I get people coming out of the woodwork that say Windows 7 should be supported 15 years later.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't you know that it's entirely unreasonable to expect your users to have hardware that's a standard feature on any machine made in the last ten years, that can be added to existing systems for around $30 and a free card slot? /s

I don't think I'll ever understand the insistence that a TPM module is a bridge too far.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

My PC has a tpm, the CPU is simply on the unsupported list.

[–] Feyd 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because of the sheer amount of e-waste it will generate by force-decommissioning hardware in active usage. Don't know why that's so hard to understand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only reason that's any different than any other time Microsoft has released a new OS is that more people own computers now than ever before, improvements in hardware power have slowed significantly, and people are more outspoken online now.

It's still not reasonable to expect them to support all hardware forever on an aging codebase.

I understand the frustration, but this isn't some new thing for this new OS in particular.

[–] Feyd 1 points 1 week ago

You're extrapolating to "forever". I just want to reduce e-waste by not forcing people to get new computers they don't want or need yet. Every year of additional service life, more people upgrade hardware for other reasons.