this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
642 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59450 readers
4341 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22332949

JD Vance said that ‘American power comes with certain strings attached’

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Cool, no more need for American military bases in our countries then. Or sharing intelligence with them. Or propping up their arms industry.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (10 children)

There's still that little issue of building up your own. Most EU countries have been demilitarizing for 30 years more and more, with the strategy being "it's a new world without wars, and also big daddy USA will protect us, and if not them, then Britain and France will". Britain has done an exit, and France alone is kinda lazy.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Most EU countries have been demilitarizing for 30 years more and more, with the strategy being "it's a new world without wars, and also big daddy USA will protect us,l

That's not the Europe I see now and sounds like a US President trope. I would agree that post-Cold War that was the case, but I'd say in the last decade at least, it's not.

But, genuine question as I'm open to being wrong, saved this is an area that interests me, do you have sources for this?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, the person above isn't being accurate at all.

While here in the UK we rely heavily on the US for control of Trident, the US dropping NATO support would just require additional defence spending and closer alignment with Europe. If Trump is bought by Russia, Putin would see this as a Very Bad Thing, and would want to keep the US in the fold because even with the US NATO would likely steamroll Russia.

The Trump dynamic is somewhat problematic, should it fester elsewhere in Europe. Globalisation was an important trait to maintain for the US, whereas most populist movements move towards buying local or supporting national interests above all else. Europe is largely self-sufficient, even in defence, so Trump would probably cut off huge numbers of imports/exports just to prop up Elon's shitty cars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Putin has been working to dismantle NATO for a long time though. Whether he is right or wrong, he clearly feels that the US pulling out of NATO is in his interest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the british military slashed budgets considerably after 2008. we've maintained special forces and we decomissioned our last carrier before its replacement was ready. we're back up to 2 carriers now but dont have enough planes to put on them.

we have virtually no stockpiles of artillery and our land forces are small.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From an entirely selfish perspective, the UK has very few threats militarily, unless the French decide to invade again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Russia have demonstrated the ability to carry out chemical weapons attacks on mainland UK soil.

if a full on exchange we would be out of air defence ammunition very quickly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The Skripal thing? No amount of tanks or missiles can stop espionage.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

Nah. It's a trope all right.

"For 20 years" is fine.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)