this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
819 points (86.9% liked)
BestOfLemmy
7230 readers
1 users here now
Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Trump spent four years breaking the law and Biden spent four years not putting his ass in jail. Meanwhile, you've NYPD officers putting bullets into the heads of people adjacent to turnstill jumpers. You've got paramilitary raids on college campuses and suburban neighbors to thrash peaceful protesters. You've got pipeline companies stealing property with the government's blessing, while locals blocking the illegal construction are sprayed with tear gas. You've got a billionaire actively buying votes three weeks before an election, while the FEC twiddles its thumbs. You've got illegal overseas occupation of territory from Okinawa to Al Anbar to Guantanamo Bay. You've got a SCOTUS that's taking bribes to issue rulings and Congressmen taking bribes to write laws and Governors taking bribes to turn over public property to private interests.
Whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.
The president cannot escape the systems of checks & balances we have to unilaterally imprison someone.
The DOJ took SBF from indictment to jail inside three months. They have been fucking around on the Trump indictments for over two years.
SBF's case was completely different, since the legality of his actions was much more easily provable as a crime. Not only was every transaction on the actual blockchain, which is immutable and couldn't have possibly been faked, but his actions didn't exactly have any nuance that could be argued in court. There were funds, they weren't his, but he used them. Case closed.
Trump's case involves not only a lot more possible statutes he could have violated, but also a lot of arbitrary actions that don't perfectly fall into a rigid box of "this is legal" or "this is illegal."
Plus, if you have more money to draw out legal fights, you can keep them going for longer, regardless of your case. SBF had most of his assets confiscated since they were almost entirely from the fraud, so he didn't have the same luxuries.
Trump was convicted of a full 37 counts in the Stormy Daniels indictment. He's lost multiple civil cases for defamation, totaling hundred of millions in judgements. Rudy Guliani lost his law license in New York over electoral interference. And 623 of the J6ers have received sentences. The idea that these folks are difficult to prosecute is absurd. But you do need to get them in front of a jury first.
You can wave your hands at the legal system and insist "Its too hard!", as so many in the Democratic Party have already done. But in the few cases where Trump or his minions do actually get in front of a jury, they consistently lose.
OJ's original criminal legal team bankrupted him. Once he was out of cash, he started losing courtroom fights. He eventually ended up in jail for assaulting a Vegas pawn shop owner over some illegally fenced sports memorabilia.
Trump's been involved in substantially more criminal activity and could be prosecuted significantly more than The Juice. But cases have to go to trial first. We have 91 indictments, but only one case that's made it through a full trial, in large part because federal prosecutors are dragging their heels.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/trump-immunity-supreme-court/
That ruling does not affect the ability of the president to put someone else in jail, unilaterally, of their own decision.