Selfhosted

39791 readers

292 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

119

how can i self host my music? (toast.ooo)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

hello,

im really tired of google music and spotify, and want to self host my downloaded music and create my library.

however, i know nothing about self hosting. My knowledge is absolutely zero. And Im completely lost about how to self host my own music. Dont find any good tutorial for dummies and i have a lot of question. I dont understand nothing. I see the tutorials of Navidrome and Ampache and still understand nothing. All of that looks extremely complicated to me.

How can i self host my music? I need to pay something? A very old and slow pc is enough?

Im completely lost. If someone can suggest something - like a tutorial , dunno - to build/self host my own music I appreciate a lot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I've always wondered that. Why use linux server's images over official ones? Are they somehow better?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

When I first used Jellyfin, the official Docker image didn't have AMD video acceleration working out of the box and the LinuxServer one did.

LinuxServer images often solve problems and work out of the box better than the official option.

I think I'm right in saying they have a standardised and reliable option for running as a none-root user too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

They're relatively easy to deploy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

For normal docker self hosters the biggest is similar structures across their images.

It config is always /config

Also they run the same user so it helps with file permission issues

https://www.linuxserver.io/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

Hmm, never looked at it this way. I might start using their images too. Question about the user: is the root in the docker container same as root of the host? I thought it was root but only in the container. And in terms of volume ownership: if I'm using Docker volumes instead of bind mounts, do I care about that? I haven't had an issue so far.