this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
528 points (99.8% liked)

World News

39110 readers
3255 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago (5 children)

French lawmakers on Friday voted in favour of a new levy that would tax assets above the €1 billion threshold at 2%.

2%? 🤣🤣🤣

Oh well, it's something...

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know 2% is fairly laughable when we're talking normal people money, but this is 20 million per 1 billion.

when simply considering the 10 biggest fortunes in France, the tax would bring in no less than €13bn for the state.

A country can do a decent bit of good for people with 13 billion.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Making it 6% would cover the cost of retirement pensions.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would be amazing! No need for 2% to be the end goal instead of just a good start. A good government serves all its citizens, not just the ones with big bank accounts.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

And I would suggest that by starting at 2%, it will be easier to get to 6% later, whereas if you try to start at 6%, you may get too much opposition.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

It's a first step. One thing this will (hopefully) provide is more accurate data on exactly how much wealth is being hoarded. The current data is being assumed to be underestimating the actual numbers

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

For a wealth tax that is quite substantial.

Every year paying 2% on the wealth above the threshold means you have to make at least 2% ROI on these assets to stay neutral with the money. That also means there is more of an interest to actually invest the money in economic activity, rather than buy assets that just appreciate price, while being tucked away in some warehouses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Every year paying 2% on the wealth above the threshold means you have to make at least 2% ROI on these assets to stay neutral with the money

2% is nothing mate. Nothing. The wealth of the rich grew by 30% during COVID IIRC. Housing prices dropped in some places but only marginally and went right back up. It wouldn't surprise me if financial assets / instruments were not included in this bill either. The rich have been getting richer at rates way past inflation and I think by now it's common knowledge that it doesn't happen with income and nearly everything but.

Again, 2% is a starter, but still a joke. Most of their assets can still sit there and accumulate value at rates that easily surpass inflation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

It's a wealth tax and not an income tax? Interesting. Is it annual, or just once, or what?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think smg like this in most countries would make a lot of difference. It’s a start