this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
1730 points (98.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17063 readers
115 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, I'm being genuine. It's theoretical and all, but if you were to put up a windmill in the same spot instead of a tower, it's possible traditional air conditioners would be able to cool the building to the same degree while also providing surplus electricity. It's also possible that you wouldn't, and I don't know the answer. It would also be interesting to compare it in different ways as well, like rather than asking "If a windmill was here" we could ask "The energy removed from the wind by the tower", because that would indicate scalability problems if one windmill was indeed able to cool one building, but maybe 100 wouldn't be able to cool 100. All hypothetical, but air conditioners/heat pumps are actually very efficient, so it's possible an active design could be more efficient than a passive one in this situation. At least, until someone does the math

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Another thing to note, to your point, is that a windmill breaks down and requires energy to repair. These wind towers in Yazd are still there and doing the same thing from hundreds of years ago

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Very true. The best machines have the fewest moving parts

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

True, and it wasn't meant as an attack at all, just a question out of curiosity. The towers are super cool

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly, I have no idea. The "probably(?)" in my comment should have been a "maybe," probably maybe.