this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19141 readers
2186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tim Walz has taken on a leveled-up approach in a race to the finish of the 2024 election, after a more cautious and buttoned-up start as Kamala Harris' running mate.

In the weeks following the vice presidential debate, Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz has been sounding more like the aggressive campaigner who got the role than the buttoned-up figure he’s cut since joining the ticket.

Dressed in khakis and a navy Harris-Walz sweatshirt Monday, Walz delivered some of his sharpest attacks yet against former President Donald Trump. Walz appeared more natural in his latest appearances on the trail, including in his signature flannel in rural Pennsylvania, after shedding the blue sport coat and white collared shirt he’s favored for the last few months.

He’s also getting back on the TV circuit, with appearances coming up on "The View" and "The Daily Show," according to a campaign official, after Walz went viral pre-running mate selection with his labeling of the GOP ticket as “weird” in a cable news interview.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, they're not saying both sides are the same. They're shitting on Biden and Harris for the Israeli genocide while ignoring the fact that Trump would have a significantly worse response.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

How would Trump be worse on Israel? Israel has already been allowed to expand its war and has faced no consequences for its crimes against civilians. Indeed, democratic leadership in government has rewarded Israel with standing ovations, free cash, and continued arms sales

So how would Trump be worse?

I don't want Trump to win anything. He sucks. But I want Democrats to feel embarrassed about promoting their party. You should feel gross about it, or admit that you are fine with appeasement policy for Israeli genocide

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Former President Donald Trump said that Israel needs to “finish what they started”.

Donald Trump has said that Israel should "hit the nuclear first and worry about the rest later" in response to an Iranian missile attack on Tuesday.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

OK and so far Israel hasn't needed nuclear weapons nor has anybody restrained them from anything they've been done

So please when you vote for Democrat remember that you are voting for genocide enablers. It's appeasement of Bibi

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

At this point I'm voting Democrat partially just to make people like you annoyed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Vote for them! Why would I be annoyed?

Just think about Palestinian child deaths while you cast your ballot for the people enabling Israel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I cast my vote based wholly on what will do the least harm. Because this world is not black and white, I must consider the impact of an individual who has openly promised to harm as many people as possible if they don't bow down. Live on high atop your knightly steed, oh great one, and look down through your poorly prescribed glasses and rejoice, for in your world there must be only one right choice.

In reality, neither choice is favorable, just better, and that isn't fun for any of us.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you vote for anybody who can potentially win, you're voting for genocide enablers. Get over it and look at everything else they stand for.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What else do they stand for? They don't want my vote

Harris refuses to consider M4A. Instead of government programs she's got a whole slate of "tax breaks" 🙄

Yeah that gets me out of my seat. The radical change our society needs...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Go read his and his party's thoughts. They wrote it all down. Or are you not arguing in good faith and attempting to dissuade others? :)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Again, how would it be worse than what is already happening under Democratic leadership?

Just admit that you are fine with genocide

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Go read the documents leaked and released. You won't listen to us. You're ready for a comeback either way. So we're not going to bother. Have fun reading! There really is some incredibly horrible stuff written by them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Then link the documents 🤷 instead of playing coy

I'm not sure what "secret Israel documents" your talking about but what's worse than "sell Israel weapons to kill children and allow them to expand their their war into neighboring countries"?

I guess you find genocide generally acceptable as long as a republican isn't part of it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

No. Any of us spending the time to create a well thought out response with documentation is pointless. You won't read it and those tactics are part of the Republican playbook: Get them to waste their time. Let them spend it making some elaborate argument and immediately shut it down by insulting them or it.

Do your own work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

gEnOcIdE

It is getting old, you literally got nothing else to promote Trump with?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump sucks but so does Harrison and so does Biden.

They all love appeasing Israel

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

so does Harrison

Who is Harrison? George Harrison? The Beatle? Harrison Ford? Is Indiana Jones running for president?

Y'know guys, I'm starting to think that this person might not be arguing in good faith...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

William Henry Harrison. Real shit president

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

On allowing Israel to kill children, they are absolutely the same

You're fine with appeasement policy but I'm not

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I didn't know American democrats ran Israel.