this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
15 points (85.7% liked)

SNOOcalypse - document, discuss, and promote the downfall of Reddit.

4672 readers
1 users here now

SNOOcalypse is closing down. If you wish to talk about Reddit, check out [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected].

This community welcomes anyone who wants to see Reddit gone. Nuke the Snoo!

When sharing links, please also share an archived version of the target of your link.

Rules:

  1. Follow lemmy.ml's global rules and code of conduct.
  2. Keep it on-topic.
  3. Don't promote illegal stuff here.
  4. Don't be stupid, noisy, obnoxious or obtuse (S.N.O.O.)
  5. Have fun, and enjoy the popcorn! 🍿

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
15
Why aren't we vocally boycotting Reddit's advertisers? (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Reddit's advertisers are already a bit wary. I honestly don't think it would take much more than a couple of dozen boycott threats via twitter, facebook, whatever for a marketing team to decide it's not worth the drama and move their advertising dollars elsewhere.

Unlike other controversies where brands can try to appeal to one side or the other, there aren't really "sides" to this. There's just people that are vehemently opposed to Reddit's current actions, and people that don't care and want to look at memes. The only people that are going to be happy that (eg) IBM are advertising on Reddit is Spez and his staff.

This seems like a simple thing the average Redditor can do right now, and I don't think it would take much to make a real impact.

I just fired off a bunch of tweets to the advertisers I can see (they seem very regional)...

Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True. But still, marketing teams are pretty skittish and a couple of dozen negative tweets or something is often enough for them to bail just to avoid even the potential for getting caught in a controversy.

Particularly as, unlike political controversies, there's nobody to get pissed off with them for bailing...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Particularly as, unlike political controversies, there’s nobody to get pissed off with them for bailing…

Thankfully there are plenty, plenty political controversies associated with Reddit that people can - and should - bring up from the grave. It's all about contextualising them to show that Reddit Inc. still has the same "corporate values" as back then, and that it would likely do the same crap as it did before. (For example, have you heard about TD?)