this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
233 points (99.6% liked)

World News

38826 readers
1980 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

No, they're pointing out the obvious. Newsweek isn't what it used to be, and the claims are all sourced from Ukraine, with no external on the record confirmations, yet.

Ukrainian media has a moral obligation to service the propaganda needs of the war. That's neither good, nor bad, that's just a part of being in an existential war for survival. I don't blame them for it, and I'm certainly not bashing them for, I'm just pointing out reality.

I can't speak for the person you're responding to, but I have no trouble understanding why North Korea would send thousands of support personnel to Ukraine as the logistical tail to support their weapons platforms. Western nations have been doing the same thing inside Ukraine.

Maybe the story is true, it's possible. But I'm going to need to see better sources provided then a Kyiv Post article citing unnamed Western officials or Newsweek using Ukrainian articles as their source information.

That's it. If anything, it's more unreasonable to not be skeptical of early reports coming from any war zone, whether you want to believe them, or not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The core of what they say is truthful, just like most propaganda. Why bother pointing it out? Why automatically doubt Ukraine, calling them very biased "at best"?

Because it's designed to undermine Ukraine and support the Kremlin and Pyong Yang.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

I can't speak to that users motivations. I can only say that initial reporting out of any warzone should be viewed skeptically. I've already provided my rationale as to why, but ultimately, it's a personal choice.

I'd rather file away first reports as unconfirmed rumors, or incomplete assessments, until I've seen additional reporting from other sources I trust.

Maybe that user really is what you said they are, or maybe they just suck at articulating the point that I was making. I don't know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

At least what Ukraine is claiming is somewhat based in reality compared to what russia claims.

According to russian sources, russia has destroyed some vehicle and plane types in higher numbers than ukraine ever had, yet Ukraine still has some.

Weird how that works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I don't understand how anything I said inferred credibility unto Russian sources, much less Russian MOD claims on Ukrainian losses.

Can you reread my original comment, and then explain to me how anything I said, is directly related to anything you just said?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Can I just downvote them anyway for being from .ml? (kidding)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My first account was on Lemmy.ml, because that was the main one recommended or showing up, during the first Reddit exodus.

I've encountered enough reasonable and well intentioned Lemmy.ml users to not assume the worst, even if I get where you're coming from.

The same cannot be said for hexabear.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

Yeah no, there's plenty of .ml users who have no idea of the political leanings of the server, I agree. Which is why I made it very clear I was kidding. I'm still keeping the instance blocked though.