this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19043 readers
578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

People weren't welcoming Dick Cheney's endorsement of Harris?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

nope and you know that. they clearly said even these monsters think Trump is worse than their ideological opposite.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I saw quite a lot of "hey we'll take whatever help we can get".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Right. Meaning if this wins over a few old school republicans, cool. Zero democrats like or welcome the ideologies of people like Cheney. Which everyone here knows.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Right. Which is the same as what I suspect you'd say if it was David Duke endorsing Harris too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's a moot point because it would never happen. Duke shares goals with Trump/Stein and none with Harris.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Lol. Cheney and Harris share the goal of wholesale war and slaughter in the middle east.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Blocking you as the pro-Trump bullshitter you are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

Haha oh noooo. I've been blocked by someone who can't face the fact that genocide matters to some people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

A self portrait of the poster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that Cheney and Duke are equivalent?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

No, Duke is a huge piece of shit, but Cheney has done immeasurably more harm to the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If one has more power, they are likely to do more harm in the world, regardless of how shitty they are of a human being. While I have no love affair with Cheney, he is not the absolutely piece of human garbage that Duke is.

You think that people here are defending Cheney, but really it's you defending Duke.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck? Duke is a piece of shit absolutely, but Cheney has done real fucking harm to the world that you can measure in dead children. Cheney is worse by far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

Go out and do an informal poll of the people you know and ask them who they think is a worse human.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Self identify however you want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I know your type. Smugly deriding anyone with an ounce of realism in their brain

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I know yours: smugly deriding anyone with an ounce of principle in their heart.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Where "principal" is "knowingly driving us toward a future we claim to oppose"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

Whoops, better double check your smug spelling correction!